Study | Animal model (n) | Study groups (n) | Duration of study | Orthodontic appliance; force magnitude and duration | Outcomes | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li et al. 2010 | 48 Sprague–Dawley rats | Group 1: DM + OTM (24) Group 2: healthy + OTM (24) | 14 days | 0.5 N closed-coil between the incisors and molar applied for 14 days | DM induced higher alveolar bone resorption during OTM | [17] |
Braga et al. 2011 | 60 rats | Group 1: DM + OTM (25) Group 2: healthy + OTM (25) Group 3: DM + OTM + insulin (10) | 12 days | 35 g Ni–Ti coil spring between the incisors and molar for 12 days | DM induced higher alveolar bone resorption leading to increased OTM | [16] |
Villarino et al. 2011 | 24 Wistar rats | Group 1: DM +OTM (8) Group 2: healthy + OTM (8) Group 3: DM + OTM + insulin (8) | 44 days | 120 ± 15 g closed-coil spring between the upper molars for 1 week | DM decreased bone remodeling during OTM. Insulin prevented effects of DM on the alveolar bone | [20] |
Zhang et al. 2011 | 48 Sprague–Dawley rats | Group 1: DM + OTM (24) Group 2: healthy + DM (24) | 10 weeks | 50 g coil spring between the maxillary incisor and molars for 14 days | DM induced higher alveolar bone resorption during OTM | [21] |
Plut et al. 2015 | 24 Wistar rats (healthy) and 24 Goto-Kakizak rats (DM) | Group 1: healthy Wistar + OTM (8) Group 2: Goto-Kakizak + OTM (8) Group 3: healthy Wistar + OTM (8) Group 4: Goto-Kakizak + OTM | 42 days | 0.25 N coil spring between the left maxillary and second and first molars for entire duration of study | DM reduced bone remodeling during OTM | [22] |
Arita et al. 2016 | 23 Spra- gue-Dawley rats | Group 1: healthy + OTM (7) Group 2: diabetic + OTM (9) Group 3: diabetic + OTM + insulin (7) | 28 days | 10 g closed-coil spring between palatal miniscrew and the maxillary molar for 2 weeks | DM reduced rate of OTM and decreased bone resorption. Insulin reduced adverse effects of DM on OTM | [15] |