Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Comparison of treatment group (T2 − T1) vs. control group (t2 − t1) in the female subjects

From: Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients

  Females
Variable Control (T2 − T1) Treated (T2 − T1) pvalue   Significance
Mean SD Mean SD Difference
Sagittal        
 OLp-Apt 4.5 2.4 3.5 2.0 0.2924 −1.0 NS
 OLp-Pg 6.1 2.6 6.2 3.2 0.9615 0.1 NS
 OLp-Co 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.1 0.6330 −0.4 NS
 Co-Apt 6.0 3.4 4.6 3.8 0.3796 −1.4 NS
 Co-Gn 9.0 3.5 8.2 4.2 0.6021 −0.8 NS
 Co-Gn minus Co-Apt 3.1 2.5 3.6 1.8 0.5992 0.5 NS
 Wits 0.6 1.5 −2.6 1.6 0.0001 −3.2 *
 Is-OLp 4.9 2.1 2.2 4.1 0.0452 −2.7 *
 Ii-OLp 4.8 2.1 6.7 3.1 0.0897 1.9 NS
 Overjet 0.1 1.5 −4.4 2.2 0.0001 −4.6 *
 Ms-OLp 5.9 1.9 3.9 3.7 0.0933 −2.0 NS
 Mi-OLp 6.7 2.4 8.2 3.8 0.2419 1.5 NS
 Molar relationship −0.7 1.1 −4.2 1.4 0.0001 −3.5 *
Vertical        
 OLs-Apt 2.9 1.9 2.6 1.8 0.7111 −0.3 NS
 ANS-Me 4.4 2.4 2.8 3.1 0.1785 −1.6 NS
 Is-NL 1.5 1.7 0.8 1.8 0.3345 −0.7 NS
 Ii-ML 2.8 1.5 0.5 2.6 0.0143 −2.2 *
 Overbite 0.0 1.1 −2.0 0.9 0.0002 −2.0 *
 Msc-NL 3.0 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.0537 −1.3 NS
 Mic-ML 2.3 1.5 3.1 1.4 0.2109 0.8 NS
Angular        
 SNA 1.4 1.9 0.1 0.9 0.0549 −1.4 NS
 SNB 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.7948 0.1 NS
 ANB 0.1 1.4 −1.4 1.0 0.0079 −1.5 *
 SNL-NL 0.1 1.9 0.2 2.7 0.8965 0.1 NS
 SNL-ML −0.8 1.0 −1.1 1.9 0.6728 −0.3 NS
 SNL-Olf −2.4 2.7 0.3 2.0 0.0152 2.7 *
 Is/NL 0.2 2.8 0.8 11.1 0.8564 0.5 NS
 Ii/ML −0.6 3.6 4.2 3.9 0.0053 4.9 *
 Inter-incisal angle 1.4 5.6 −3.1 10.0 0.1722 −4.5 NS
  1. * = p<.05.