Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of treatment group (T2 − T1) vs. control group (t2 − t1) in the female subjects

From: Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients

 

Females

Variable

Control (T2 − T1)

Treated (T2 − T1)

pvalue

 

Significance

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Difference

Sagittal

       

 OLp-Apt

4.5

2.4

3.5

2.0

0.2924

−1.0

NS

 OLp-Pg

6.1

2.6

6.2

3.2

0.9615

0.1

NS

 OLp-Co

1.4

1.6

1.0

2.1

0.6330

−0.4

NS

 Co-Apt

6.0

3.4

4.6

3.8

0.3796

−1.4

NS

 Co-Gn

9.0

3.5

8.2

4.2

0.6021

−0.8

NS

 Co-Gn minus Co-Apt

3.1

2.5

3.6

1.8

0.5992

0.5

NS

 Wits

0.6

1.5

−2.6

1.6

0.0001

−3.2

*

 Is-OLp

4.9

2.1

2.2

4.1

0.0452

−2.7

*

 Ii-OLp

4.8

2.1

6.7

3.1

0.0897

1.9

NS

 Overjet

0.1

1.5

−4.4

2.2

0.0001

−4.6

*

 Ms-OLp

5.9

1.9

3.9

3.7

0.0933

−2.0

NS

 Mi-OLp

6.7

2.4

8.2

3.8

0.2419

1.5

NS

 Molar relationship

−0.7

1.1

−4.2

1.4

0.0001

−3.5

*

Vertical

       

 OLs-Apt

2.9

1.9

2.6

1.8

0.7111

−0.3

NS

 ANS-Me

4.4

2.4

2.8

3.1

0.1785

−1.6

NS

 Is-NL

1.5

1.7

0.8

1.8

0.3345

−0.7

NS

 Ii-ML

2.8

1.5

0.5

2.6

0.0143

−2.2

*

 Overbite

0.0

1.1

−2.0

0.9

0.0002

−2.0

*

 Msc-NL

3.0

1.7

1.6

1.3

0.0537

−1.3

NS

 Mic-ML

2.3

1.5

3.1

1.4

0.2109

0.8

NS

Angular

       

 SNA

1.4

1.9

0.1

0.9

0.0549

−1.4

NS

 SNB

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.0

0.7948

0.1

NS

 ANB

0.1

1.4

−1.4

1.0

0.0079

−1.5

*

 SNL-NL

0.1

1.9

0.2

2.7

0.8965

0.1

NS

 SNL-ML

−0.8

1.0

−1.1

1.9

0.6728

−0.3

NS

 SNL-Olf

−2.4

2.7

0.3

2.0

0.0152

2.7

*

 Is/NL

0.2

2.8

0.8

11.1

0.8564

0.5

NS

 Ii/ML

−0.6

3.6

4.2

3.9

0.0053

4.9

*

 Inter-incisal angle

1.4

5.6

−3.1

10.0

0.1722

−4.5

NS

  1. * = p<.05.