Skip to main content

Table 7 Descriptive statistics of selected studies

From: Radiologically determined orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in incisors after non-surgical orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review

Article

Treatment duration (months)

X-ray

Root resorption (RR)

RR - specific tooth and severity

Additional information

DeShields [[32]]

M = 20.5

PA

51/52 cases had resorption in at least 1 Mx incisor

Tooth 12a

Treatment time edgewise (months)

 

F = 22.5

  

 Grade 0 - 1/52

 Male = 11.6

 

G = 21.6 ± 5.2

 

Severitya

 Grade 1 - 4/52

 Female = 10.1

   

 Grade 0 - 12/208

 Grade 2 - 23/52

 Mean = 10.8 ± 5.7

   

 Grade 1 - 24/208

 Grade 3 - 21/52

Headgear time (if used) (months)

   

 Grade 2 - 82/208

 Grade 4 - 3/52

 Male = 16.5

   

 Grade 3 - 79/208

Tooth 11a

 Female = 17.0

   

 Grade 4 - 11/208

 Grade 0 - 4/52

 Mean = 16.8 ± 7.6

   

 Grade 5 - 0/208

 Grade 1 - 7/52

Class II elastics (if used) (months)

   

Gender-severitya

 Grade 2 - 19/52

 Male = 7.5

   

 4 M - grade 2

 Grade 3 - 17/52

 Female = 5.2

   

 17 M - grade 3

 Grade 4 - 5/52

 Mean = 6.3 ± 5.6

   

 3 M - grade 4

Tooth 21a

 
   

 1 F - grade 1

 Grade 0 - 3/52

 
   

 7 M - grade 2

 Grade 1 - 5/52

 
   

 17 F - grade 3

 Grade 2 - 26/52

 
   

 3 F - grade 4

 Grade 3 - 17/52

 
    

 Grade 4 - 1/52

 
    

Tooth 22a

 
    

 Grade 0 - 4/52

 
    

 Grade 1 - 8/52

 
    

 Grade 2 - 14/52

 
    

 Grade 3 - 24/52

 
    

 Grade 4 - 2/52

 

Hollender et al. [[33]]

Mean = 18

PA

Grade I or II RRb

Tooth (grade 1 or 2 RR)b

Mx anterior teeth most affected

 60/120 Teeth

 16 - 3/12

48/60

Severity

 15 - 3/12

Lateral incisor

 Grade 1 - 53/60

 13 - 5/12

22/24

 Grade 2 - 7/60

 12 - 11/12

No grade 3 resorption

 11 - 7/12

 21 - 6/12

 22 - 11/12

 23 - 8/12

 25 - 3/12

 26 - 3/12

Eisel et al. [[34]]

38 ± 20 (total sample)

PA

Mean four upper incisors:

Not described

Only 29 patients had periapicals to quantify RR. No explanation why only these ones

 Up to 1 mm, 21 individuals

 Between 1 and 2 mm, 6 individuals

 Between 2 and 3 mm, 1 individual

 More than 3 mm, 1 individual

Maximum for either upper incisor

 Up to 1 mm, 12 individuals

 Between 1 and 2 mm 6 individuals

 Between 2 and 3 mm 6 individuals

 More than 4 mm 5 individuals

RR dx through Linge and Linge method [[12]]

Reukers et al. [[35]]

Overall = 20.4 ± 6.0

PA

Mean degree of resorption

 

Statistical test showed no difference in root resorption between straight wire and edgewise

Straight wire = 21.6 ± 4.8

 Overall – 7.8 ± 6.9%

Edgewise = 19.2 ± 6.0

 Straight wire - 8.2 ± 6.4%

 Edgewise - 7.5 ± 7.6%

Study only focused on root resorption of Mx central incisors

Prevalence

 Overall - (40/61) 65.6%

 Straight wire - (24/32) 75%

 Edgewise - (16/29) 55%

Taner et al. [[36]]

28.1 ± 9.0

Ceph

Mean RR

N/A

N/A

2.1 ± 1.6 mm

Mavragani et al. [[40]]

N/A

PA

Same data as 2002

Same data as 2002

Same data as 2002

Mavragani et al. [[37]]

N/A

PA

Tooth/median

Mean RR

Root elongation was noted for 50/280 teeth

 Control

 12 - 1.86 ± 0.26 mm

 12 - 17.03 mm

 11 - 1.82 ± 0.26 mm

Age at T 1 was significantly higher among patients showing root shortening of lateral incisors than those showing root elongation (p < 0.05)

 11 - 16.79 mm

 21 - 1.93 ± 0.25 mm

 21 - 16.69 mm

 22 - 1.78 ± 0.33 mm

 22 - 17.48 mm

Shortened roots

Roots that were incompletely developed before treatment reached a significantly greater length than those that were fully developed at the T 1

Shortened

 12 - 59/72 teeth

 12 - 14.55 mm

 11 - 60/72 teeth

 11 - 15.32 mm

 21 - 58/67 teeth

 21 - 15.30 mm

 22 - 53/69 teeth

 22 - 13.77 mm

Elongated

Elongated roots

 12 - 17.36 mm

 12 - 13/72 teeth

 11 - 17.56 mm

 11 - 12/72 teeth

 21 - 15.52 mm

 21 - 9/67 teeth

 22 - 16.85 mm

 22 - 16/69 teeth

Liou and Chang [[38]]

En-masse

PA

Group I

Group I

Group I (ANB 7.1° ± 1.9°)

(Group I) 28.3 ± 7.3

FFA

 16% to 20% (2.5 to 2.8 mm)

 12 - 20.0 ± 7.3% (2.7 ± 1.0 mm)

Group II (ANB 3.2° ± 2.9°)

(Group II) 22.7 ± 5.0

Group 2

Apical RR of Mx central incisor was significantly correlated to the duration of treatment (p = 0.026) but not to the amount of en-masse retraction, intrusion, or palatal tipping of Mx incisors

 13.4% to 14.4% (2.1 to 2.3 mm)

 11 - 19.6 ± 6.6% (2.8 ± 1.0 mm)

 21 - 16.8 ± 8.8% (2.5 ± 1.4 mm)

Mx lateral incisors was significantly greater in group I than in group II

 22 - 16.0 ± 9.2% (2.5 ± 1.5 mm)

Group II

 12 - 14.4 ± 7.3% (2.1 ± 1.4 mm)

 11 - 14.4 ± 8.5% (2.3 ± 1.7 mm)

 21 - 13.6 ± 7.6% (2.1 ± 1.5 mm)

 22 - 13.4 ± 7.3% (2.1 ± 1.3 mm)

Martins et al. [[39]]

28.0 ± 9.4

PA

RR severityc

  

 0 = 0/112 (0%)

 1 = 19/112 (16.96%)

 2 = 39/112 (34.83%)

 3 = 47/112 (41.96%)

 4 = 7/112 (6.25%)

  1. aGrade 0 - no resorption, grade 1 - possible resorption (some indistinctness to apical outline), grade 2 - definite resorption (apical outline was definitely irregular, but the root was not shortened or blunted), grade 3 - mild apical blunting (<3 mm), grade 4 - moderate apical blunting (>3 mm but <1/3 root length, grade 5 - severe blunting (>1/3 of the root length loss); b0 - no visible resorption, 1 - apical resorption ≤2 mm, 2 - apical resorption >2 mm ≤1/3 of the root length, 3 - >1/3 of the root length; c0 - no root resorption, 1 - mild resorption, normal length, and only displaying irregular contour, 2 - moderate resorption, small area of root loss with the apex exhibiting an almost straight contour, 3 - accentuated resorption, loss of almost 1/3 root length, 4 - extreme resorption, loss of more than 1/3 of root length. MX, Maxillary; M, Months; RR, Root Resorption; PA, Periapical.