Skip to main content

Table 8 Methodological score of selected reports

From: Radiologically determined orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in incisors after non-surgical orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review

Methodological quality criteria

DeShields [[32]]

Hollender et al. [[33]]

Eisel et al. [[34]]

Taner et al. [[36]]

Mavragani et al. [[40]] and [[37]]

Liou and Chang [[38]]

Martins et al. [[39]]

Eligibility criteria - clearly described (✓), adequate (✓)

✓≠

≠≠

✘

✓≠

✓≠

✓≠

✓≠

Sample size - calculated (✓), adequate (✓)

✘✓

✘✘

✘✘

✘✓

✘✓

✘✓

✘✓

Randomization/consecutive selection - stated (✓)

✘

✘

✓

✘

✘

✘

✘

Blinding of assessor - stated (✓)

✘

✘

✘

✘

✘

✘

✘

Intervention details - clearly described (✓)

≠

≠

✘

✓

✓

✓

✓

Outcome measures - clearly described (✓)

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

Selective reporting - avoided (✓)

✘

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

Adverse effects - described (✓)

✘

✘

✓

✘

≠

✘

✘

Data analysis - appropriate (✓)

≠

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

Point estimates and variability - exact p value (✓), variability measures, SD/CI (✓)

✘≠

✘✓

✘≠

✘✓

✓

✓

✓

Quality score (percentage of total)

38.46

42.30

42.30

57.69

69.23

65.38

65.38

  1. Maximum number of ✓ = 13. ✓, fulfilled satisfactorily the methodological criteria (1 check point); ≠, fulfilled partially the methodological criteria (0.5 check point); ✘, did not fulfill the methodological criteria (0 check point).