Skip to main content

Table 4 The PRISMA for Abstracts checklist [[68]]

From: Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews

Item

Description

Title

1. Title

Identification of the study as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both

Background

2. Objectives

The research question including components such as participants, interventions, comparators, and outcomes

Methods

3. Eligibility criteria

Study and report characteristics used as criteria for inclusion

4. Information sources

Key databases searched and search dates

5. Risk of bias

Methods of assessing risk of bias

Results

6. Included studies

Number and type of included studies and participants and relevant characteristics of studies

7. Synthesis of results

Results for main outcomes (benefits and harms), preferably indicating the number of studies and participants for each. If meta-analysis was done, include summary measures and confidence intervals.

8. Description of the effect

Direction of the effect (i.e., which group is favored) and size of the effect in terms meaningful to clinicians and patients

Discussion

9. Strengths and limitations of evidence

Brief summary of strengths and limitations of evidence (e.g., inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness, or risk of bias, other supporting or conflicting evidence)

10. Interpretation

General interpretation of the results and important implications

Other

11. Funding

Primary source of funding for the review

12. Registration

Registration number and registry name