Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of pooled estimates performed with the random effects model and analysis of heterogeneity

From: Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variables

Number of treated groups

Kind of analysis performed, meta analysis (MA) or exploratory analysis (EA)

Heterogeneity

Test of nullZ(P-value)

Standard difference in means

95% confidence intervals

Significance (P-value)

I 2

Q(P-value)

T 2

SNA (°)

7

MA

69.362%

19.584 (0.003)

0.338

−0.070 (0.944)

−0.02

−0.54 to 0.50

0.944

SNB (°)

7

MA

90.800%

65.214 (0.000)

2.029

−3.429 (0.001)***

−1.97

−3.09 to −0.84

0.001***

ANB (°)

7

MA

89.614%

57.767 (0.000)

2.029

4.311 (0.000)***

2.48

1.36 to 3.61

0.000***

Wits appraisal (mm)

5

MA

95.645%

91.844 (0.000)

6.364

3.083 (0.002)**

3.62

1.32 to 5.93

0.002**

Co-Gn (mm)

4

EA

11.164%

3.377 (0.337)

0.018

−1.483 (0.138)

−0.29

−0.68 to 0.09

0.138

SN-ML (°)

5

MA

70.569%

13.591 (0.009)

0.437

3.321 (0.001)***

1.17

0.48 to 1.86

0.001***

Gonial angle (°)

6

MA

78.915%

23.714 (0.000)

0.636

−2.164 (0.030)*

−0.80

−1.52 to 0.08

0.030*

N-Me (mm)

3

EA

65.651%

5.823 (0.054)

0.321

3.428 (0.001)***

1.39

0.59 to 2.18

0.001***

UFH (mm)

3

EA

9.200%

2.203 (0.332)

0.012

1.251 (0.211)

0.26

−0.15 to 0.68

0.211

LFAH (mm)

3

EA

0%

1.944 (0.378)

0

1.328 (0.184)

0.27

−0.13 to 0.66

0.184

Co-Go (mm)

3

EA

0%

0.369 (0.832)

0

−0.987 (0.324)

−0.22

−0.66 to 0.22

0.324

Overjet (mm)

3

EA

84.912%

13.256 (0.001)

1.548

3.291 (0.001)***

2.62

1.06 to 4.19

0.001***

Overbite (mm)

3

EA

20.552%

2.517 (0.284)

0.040

−0.943 (0.345)

−0.24

−0.74 to 0.26

0.345

  1. *Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05, **statistically significant at P ≤ 0.01, ***statistically significant at P ≤ 0.00.