From: Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region
Predictor variable | Estimate | Odds ratio | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | <18 years | −0.1182 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
≥18 years | Reference | |||
Gender | Female | −1.1383 | 0.32 | 0.11 |
Male | Reference | |||
Presence of medical condition | Yes | 1.50 | 4.48 | 0.14 |
No | Reference | |||
Lomas (Mondeal, Tuttligen, Germany) | Yes | −0.7983 | 0.45 | 0.31 |
No | Reference | |||
Diameter of implant | 1.50 or 1.80 | 0.5630 | 1.76 | 0.40 |
2.00 or 2.30 | Reference | |||
Length of implant | 6 to 8 mm | 0.7078 | 2.03 | 0.37 |
9 mm | Reference | |||
Force | 150 g | −0.4282 | 0.65 | 0.59 |
>150 g | Reference | |||
Type of movement | Purely intrusive | −0.6377 | 0.53 | 0.34 |
All others | Reference | |||
Oral hygiene | Poor | 1.0269 | 2.79 | 0.09 |
Good | Reference | |||
Operator experience | Experienced | −0.3145 | 0.73 | 0.6848 |
Inexperienced | Reference | |||
Use of pilot hole | Yes | −0.8610 | 0.42 | 0.32 |
No | Reference | |||
Side of implant | Left | 0.3962 | 1.49 | 0.53 |
Right | Reference |