Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Error of frequency of subjects and range of acceptable error in the X-axis

From: Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback

Patient name Tip of the nose Subnasale ST A Upper lip Lower lip ST B ST Pg ST Mn ST Gn Overall average
 Subject 1 1.3 0.6 −1.1 −2.2 0.1 −0.6 0 9.3 3.3  
 Subject 2 1.4 2.1 0.2 1.2 4.2 0.8 0.7 0.8 −0.1  
 Subject 3 0.2 0.3 1.3 −1.2 4.7 −0.1 8.3 0.6 3.9  
 Subject 4 −1.1 0.8 −1.3 −1.6 2.5 −0.3 −0.6 −0.9 −0.9  
 Subject 5 −1.1 −1.4 −1 −4.7 4 −1.9 0.6 16 6.2  
 Subject 6 0.1 3.4 3.7 0.3 3.7 0.5 3.1 −4.5 −1.7  
 Subject 7 −1.8 −0.3 −1.9 0.4 3.2 −0.2 1.9 4.5 1.9  
 Subject 8 −0.3 −6 −1.9 −1.5 0.8 −1 2.6 −0.4 1.4  
 Subject 9 0.5 1.6 −0.7 −0.8 −0.1 −1.1 0 0.4 0.6  
 Subject 10 0.1 −0.9 0.4 −2.5 1.9 −0.2 2.1 4.2 2.1  
 Subject 11 −0.5 −0.2 −1.1 −1.5 1.1 0.6 1.7 0.2 1.3  
 Subject 12 −0.1 0.6 0.4 0.6 3.6 0.1 0.7 3.5 0.6  
 Subject 13 0.1 −0.8 −1.2 −3.5 0.5 −0.6 0.2 −1.9 0.8  
 Subject 14 0.5 −1.8 −0.8 −0.5 2 −1.2 −0.2 −2.8 −1.6  
Mean −0.05 −0.14 −0.36 −1.25 2.30 −0.37 1.51 2.07 1.27  
Mean (absolute value) 0.65 1.49 1.21 1.61 2.31 0.66 1.62 3.57 1.89  
SD 0.89 2.19 1.49 1.64 1.63 0.76 2.26 5.31 2.17  
Percent of acceptable error <0.5 mm 64 % 21 % 21 % 21 % 21 % 43 % 29 % 21 % 7 % 28 %
Percent of acceptable error <1 mm 64 % 57 % 36 % 36 % 29 % 71 % 57 % 43 % 36 % 48 %
Percent of acceptable error <2 mm 100 % 78 % 92 % 71 % 57 % 100 % 92 % 50 % 71 % 79 %