Skip to main content

Table 3 Lateral incisor measurements from axial and sagittal sections

From: Three-dimensional evaluation of root dimensions and alveolar ridge width of maxillary lateral incisors in patients with unilateral agenesis

 

Group

Mean

SD

25th percentile

50th percentile

75th percentile

p

Axial method

 Labiopalatal root width (mm)

  At CEJ

MLIA

5.86

0.71

5.60

5.90

6.10

<0.0001*

Control

7.24

0.43

6.90

7.20

7.65

  4 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

4.99

0.64

4.60

4.99

5.50

<0.0001*

Control

5.97

0.43

5.50

6.05

6.25

  8 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

4.06

0.69

3.50

4.00

4.60

0.009*

Control

4.86

0.65

4.30

4.65

5.50

 Mesiodistal root width (mm)

  At CEJ

MLIA

4.91

0.31

4.70

4.90

5.20

<0.0001*

Control

5.66

0.54

5.30

5.55

6.15

  4 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

3.86

0.42

3.50

3.80

4.30

0.003*

Control

4.57

0.69

4.05

4.55

4.95

  8 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

3.15

0.42

2.80

3.00

3.30

0.092

Control

3.57

0.68

2.95

3.30

4.20

Sagittal method

 Labiopalatal root width (mm)

  At CEJ

MLIA

5.94

0.72

5.60

5.90

6.30

<0.0001*

Control

7.21

0.40

6.90

7.20

7.55

  4 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

5.01

0.63

4.60

5.00

5.60

<0.0001*

Control

5.94

0.42

5.55

5.85

6.35

  8 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

4.12

0.70

3.50

4.30

4.60

0.018

Control

4.87

0.67

4.45

4.80

5.60

 Mesiodistal root width (mm)

  At CEJ

MLIA

4.85

0.27

4.60

4.90

5.00

<0.0001*

Control

5.74

0.52

5.35

5.70

6.20

  4 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

3.83

0.43

3.50

3.60

4.20

0.003*

Control

4.53

0.67

3.95

4.50

5.00

  8 mm apical to CEJ

MLIA

3.06

0.43

2.70

3.00

3.30

0.05

 

Control

3.53

0.67

2.90

3.30

4.10

 

Width at incisal edge (IE, mm)

MLIA

4.40

0.82

3.90

4.40

4.90

<0.0001*

Control

6.16

0.51

5.90

6.00

6.60

 

Width at midpoint (mm)

MLIA

5.45

0.95

5.20

5.60

5.90

<0.0001*

Control

7.00

0.23

6.75

7.05

7.20

 
  1. Since three distance points from CEJ were used to examine the outcomes, in order to minimize type 1 errors arising from multiple outcome assessments (at CEJ, 4 mm apical to CEJ, and 8 mm apical to CEJ), adjustments (based on Bonferroni formula) were made to p values to be deemed statistically significant. A p value of <0.017 was deemed to be statistically significant
  2. *p value is statistically significant at p < 0.017