From: Comparative SEM analysis of nine F22 aligner cleaning strategies
Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | Method 5 | Method 6 | Method 7 | Method 8 | Method 9 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT 1 | 143.618 | 126.714 | 111.379 | 112.007 | 109.033 | 124.756 | 132.793 | 117.481 | 81.492 |
PT 2 | 154.730 | 115.470 | 111.380 | 109.226 | 109.219 | 132.481 | 131.457 | 114.486 | 83.033 |
PT 3 | 140.032 | 107.871 | 112.168 | 140.546 | 133.622 | 107.512 | 125.045 | 129.604 | 84.454 |
PT 4 | 163.922 | 114.175 | 131.064 | 108.467 | 145.483 | 138.692 | 117.787 | 119.598 | 80.219 |
PT 5 | 147.972 | 122.249 | 134.454 | 130.679 | 141.776 | 134.050 | 108.033 | 116.978 | 73.534 |
MEAN | 150.055 | 117.296 | 120.089 | 120.185 | 127.827 | 127.498 | 123.023 | 119.629 | 80.546 |