Fig. 7From: A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional radiography in diagnosing the extent of root resorptionsModified Malmgren scores of CBCT versus periapical radiographs (PA) versus panoramic radiographs (PAN). PAN differed significantly (p < 0.05) in the assessment of both blinded and not blinded modified Malmgren score compared to CBCT. Similarly, PA differed significantly in not blinded (p < 0.01) compared to CBCTBack to article page