Skip to main content

Table 4 Intergroup comparison of treatment changes (t tests)

From: Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols

 

Group 1—3 extractions (n = 31)

Group 2—1 extraction (n = 32)

 

Variables

Mean

S.D.

Mean

S.D.

P

Maxillary component

 SNA (°)

− 1.73

3.17

− 0.58

2.79

0.131

 Co-A (mm)

− 0.95

4.12

− 0.29

2.00

0.416

Mandibular component

 SNB (°)

0.49

2.27

− 0.02

2.27

0.376

 Co-Gn (mm)

3.55

5.14

1.98

3.27

0.153

Maxillomandibular relationship

 ANB (°)

− 2.21

2.19

− 0.56

1.87

0.002a

 NAP (°)

2.95

4.44

0.49

2.79

0.010a

Growth pattern

 SN.GoGn (°)

− 0.58

2.89

− 1.18

3.12

0.434

 LAFH (mm)

2.45

2.56

1.10

3.51

0.088

Maxillary dentoalveolar component

 Mx1.NA (°)

− 1.11

6.38

1.91

7.80

0.098

 Mx1-NA (mm)

− 0.68

3.09

− 0.38

3.27

0.716

 Mx1-PP (mm)

− 0.66

1.24

− 0.43

1.74

0.533

 Mx6-PP (mm)

1.96

2.10

0.78

1.98

0.024a

 Mx Molar asymmetry (mm)

− 0.16

0.43

0.75

1.13

0.000a

Mandibular dentoalveolar component

 Md1.NB (°)

− 1.03

5.08

3.09

4.59

0.001a

 Md1-NB (mm)

− 0.47

0.96

0.86

1.34

0.000a

 IMPA (°)

− 0.67

5.58

3.13

5.62

0.009a

 Md1-GoGn (mm)

0.98

2.05

0.49

1.86

0.325

 Md6-GoGn (mm)

2.12

1.67

1.40

1.63

0.087

 Md Molar asymmetry (mm)

1.06

0.57

0.09

0.72

0.000a

Dental relationship

 Overjet (mm)

− 2.23

1.72

− 2.03

1.87

0.648

 Overbite (mm)

− 0.88

2.27

− 1.16

1.31

0.551

Upper lip

 UL-S Line (mm)

− 1.85

2.34

− 1.28

1.44

0.241

 Prn-H (mm)

3.80

4.43

2.65

2.88

0.223

Lower lip

 LL-S Line (mm)

− 1.68

2.27

− 0.88

1.47

0.101

Facial convexity and nasolabial angle

 Z Angle (°)

2.15

4.72

0.68

5.41

0.254

 N’.Sn.Pog’(°)

1.41

4.68

0.03

3.89

0.207

 Cm.Sn.UL (°)

1.71

7.73

1.69

9.22

0.992

  1. aStatistically significant at P < 0.05