Table 2 Esthetic grade (mean ± standard deviation) and rank on the canine shape by all observers
From: Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
Canine shape | All observers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Edge width (%) | Edge height (mm) | Grade | Rank |
62.5 | − 0.5 | 4.38 ± 0.60 | 1 |
50 | 0 | 4.17 ± 0.76 | 2 |
50 | − 0.5 | 4.08 ± 0.75 | 3 |
62.5 | 0 | 3.89 ± 0.48 | 4 |
75 | − 0.5 | 3.88 ± 0.64 | 5 |
37.5 | 0 | 3.76 ± 0.69 | 6 |
25 | 0 | 3.64 ± 0.27 | 7 |
0 | 0.5 | 3.47 ± 0.24 | 8 |
75 | 0 | 3.45 ± 0.46 | 9 |
37.5 | 0.5 | 3.40 ± 0.70 | 10 |
12.5 | 0.5 | 3.38 ± 0.23 | 11 |
25 | 0.5 | 3.27 ± 0.52 | 12 |
12.5 | 1.0 | 3.23 ± 0.22 | 13 |
0 | 1.0 | 3.22 ± 0.19 | 14 |
50 | 0.5 | 3.22 ± 0.26 | 15 |
37.5 | − 0.5 | 3.02 ± 0.11 | 16 |
62.5 | 0.5 | 2.92 ± 0.33 | 17 |
12.50 | 0 | 2.92 ± 0.19 | 18 |
0 | 0 | 2.92 ± 0.30 | 19 |
25 | 1.0 | 2.72 ± 0.25 | 20 |
25 | − 0.5 | 2.66 ± 0.30 | 21 |
37.5 | 1.0 | 2.44 ± 0.34 | 22 |
12.50 | − 0.5 | 2.43 ± 0.11 | 23 |
50 | 1.0 | 2.33 ± 0.90 | 24 |
75 | 0.5 | 2.23 ± 0.28 | 25 |
62.5 | 1.0 | 2.06 ± 0.55 | 26 |
0 | − 0.5 | 1.90 ± 0.09 | 27 |
75 | 1.0 | 1.43 ± 0.60 | 28 |