Table 1 Attractiveness ranking of photographs according to the groups
From: Effects of different nose types on class II treatments for female patients
Ranking of attractiveness | Orthodontist (mean ± standard deviation) | Plastic surgeon (mean ± standard deviation) | Lay persons (mean ± standard deviation) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | OS4 (83.23 ± 15.89) | OS4 (78.97 ± 12.54) | OS4 (80.88 ± 13.62) |
2 | OS3 (80.97 ± 13.93) | OS3 (78.53 ± 14.27) | OS3 (79.50 ± 23.71) |
3 | OS1 (63.16 ± 14.73) | OS2 (67.79 ± 17.67) | CT3 (62.88 ± 19.98) |
4 | OS2 (62.68 ± 14.87) | CT3 (64.26 ± 16.42) | OS2 (60.88 ± 26.06) |
5 | PT4 (60.14 ± 17.02) | PT4 (62.85 ± 15.78) | PT4 (60.74 ± 21.03) |
6 | PT3 (58.32 ± 13.13) | OS1 (62.35 ± 14.62) | OS1 (59.91 ± 23.93) |
7 | CT3 (56.13 ± 14.35) | PT3 (62.35 ± 13.77) | CT4 (57.21 ± 24.65) |
8 | CT4 (55.81 ± 15.22) | CT4 (59.68 ± 16.03) | PT3 (56.62 ± 24.04) |
9 | PT1 (50.97 ± 16.45) | PT1 (55.09 ± 14.06) | CT1 (50.29 ± 25.16) |
10 | OS5 (50.97 ± 14.45) | CT2 (53.91 ± 17.73) | PT2 (47.79 ± 24.47) |
11 | CT1 (50.90 ± 15.40) | CT1 (53.74 ± 16.04) | PT1 (45.68 ± 26.11) |
12 | CT2 (46.13 ± 14.58) | PT2 (50.74 ± 20.23) | CT2 (42.65 ± 25.05) |
13 | OS6 (43.29 ± 17.31) | OS5 (49.26 ± 17.01) | OS5 (29.94 ± 20.11) |
14 | PT2 (43.06 ± 12.95) | OS6 (44.06 ± 16.63) | PT5 (26.91 ± 24.46) |
15 | PT5 (40.81 ± 15.65) | PT5 (42.29 ± 15.64) | OS6 (26.18 ± 21.07) |
16 | CT5 (37.26 ± 12.09) | PT6 (37.74 ± 15.52) | PT6 (25.15 ± 18.23) |
17 | PT6 (36.71 ± 12.24) | CT5 (37.06 ± 16.79) | CT5 (24.44 ± 16.86) |
18 | CT6 (31.13 ± 14.06) | CT6 (36.76 ± 14.86) | CT6 (20.47 ± 14.84) |