Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of attractiveness scores among the groups

From: Effects of different nose types on class II treatments for female patients

 

Mean ± standard deviation (orthodontist)

Mean ± standard deviation (plastic surgeon)

Mean ± standard deviation (lay persons)

P

PT1

50.97 ± 16.45

55.09 ± 14.06

45.68 ± 26.11

.131

PT2

43.06 ± 12.95

50.74 ± 20.23

47.79 ± 24.47

.262

PT3

58.32 ± 13.13

62.35 ± 13.77

56.62 ± 24.04

.410

PT4

60.14 ± 17.02

62.85 ± 15.78

60.74 ± 21.03

.746

PT5

40.81 ± 15.65a

42.29 ± 15.64a

26.91 ± 24.46b

.001*

PT6

36.71 ± 12.24a

37.74 ± 15.52a

25.15 ± 18.23b

.001*

CT1

50.90 ± 15.40

53.74 ± 16.04

50.29 ± 25.16

.591

CT2

46.13 ± 14.58

53.91 ± 17.73

42.65 ± 25.05

.129

CT3

56.13 ± 14.35

64.26 ± 16.42

62.88 ± 19.98

.052

CT4

55.81 ± 15.22

59.68 ± 16.03

57.21 ± 24.65

.502

CT5

37.26 ± 12.09a

37.06 ± 16.79a

24.44 ± 16.86b

.001*

CT6

31.13 ± 14.06a

36.76 ± 14.86a

20.47 ± 14.84b

.001*

OS1

63.16 ± 14.73

62.35 ± 14.62

59.91 ± 23.93

.497

OS2

62.68 ± 14.87

67.79 ± 17.67

60.88 ± 26.06

.446

OS3

80.97 ± 13.93

78.53 ± 14.27

79.50 ± 23.71

.143

OS4

83.23 ± 15.89

78.97 ± 12.54

80.88 ± 13.62

.242

OS5

50.97 ± 14.45a

49.26 ± 17.01a

29.94 ± 20.11b

.001*

OS6

43.29 ± 17.31a

44.06 ± 16.63a

26.18 ± 21.07b

.001*

  1. PT pre-treatment, CT camouflage treatment, OS orthognathic surgery
  2. *Significant at P < 0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis test
  3. a,bGroups with the same letter are not significantly different (Mann-Whitney U test)