Skip to main content

Table 3 Bland-Altman analysis for the cephalometric measurements between conventional and artificial intelligence methods

From: Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network

 

95% of limit of agreement

Width

 

Upper limit

Lower limit

Skeletal measurement

   

 Saddle angle (°)

5.1

−2.8

7.9

 Articular angle (°)

6.2

−7.4

13.6

 Gonion angle (°)

7.6

−8.6

16.2

 Sum

5.4

−5.3

10.7

 Ant. cranial base (mm)

6.8

−4.6

11.4

 Post. cranial base (mm)

8.5

−5.6

14.1

 Ramus height (mm)

7.5

−6.1

13.6

 SNA (°)

3.1

−4.1

7.2

 SNB (°)

2.6

−3.3

5.9

 ANB (°)

2.7

−2.9

5.6

 Facial angle (Down’s)

3.0

−4.6

7.6

 Post.FH/Ant.FH

5.3

−4.9

10.2

 Mn. plane angle (°)

5.2

−5.9

11.1

 FMA (°)

6.2

−5.0

11.2

 Palatal plane angle (°)

3.1

−3.7

6.8

Dental measurement

   

 Wits appraisal

14.4

−12.0

26.4

 FMIA (°)

7.6

−9.9

17.5

 IMPA (°)

8.8

−6.6

15.4

 Mx 1 to SN (°)

9.5

−10.6

20.1

 Interincisal angle (°)

14.8

−14.8

29.6

 Mx1 to NA (°)

10.9

−11.1

22.0

 Mx1 to NA (mm)

6.5

−2.8

9.3

 Mn1 to NB (°)

7.8

−7.7

15.5

 Mn1 to NB (mm)

5.0

−0.7

5.7

Soft tissue measurement

   

 Esthetic line to upper lip (mm)

2.2

−2.2

4.4

 Esthetic line to lower lip (mm)

3.0

−3.1

6.1

  1. All measurements were within the limit of agreement