Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of open gingival embrasures between the non-occurrence and occurrence groups in the mandible

From: IPR treatment and attachments design in clear aligner therapy and risk of open gingival embrasures in adults

Variables

Non-occurrence (N = 74)

Occurrence (N = 51)

P value

Age, years

24.5 ± 7.3

26.4 ± 5.6

0.113

Treatment duration, months

27.1 ± 12.5

28.1 ± 12.0

0.692

Gender

0.374

    Female

61 (82.4)

45 (88.2)

 

    Male

13 (17.6)

6 (11.8)

 

Malocclusion

0.864

    Class I

37 (50.0)

28 (54.9)

 

    Class II

30 (40.5)

18 (35.3)

 

    Class III

7 (9.5)

5 (9.8)

 

IPR in anterior teeth

0.199

    0 mm

29 (39.2)

18 (35.3)

 

    0–2 mm

17 (23.0)

19 (37.3)

 

     ≥ 2 mm

28 (37.8)

14 (27.5)

 

IPR in incisors

0.683

    0 mm

34 (45.9)

21 (41.2)

 

    0–1 mm

18 (24.3)

16 (31.4)

 

    ≥ 1 mm

22 (29.7)

14 (27.5)

 

IPR in central incisors

0.653

    0 mm

42 (56.8)

31 (60.8)

 

     > 0 mm

32 (43.2)

20 (39.2)

 

Attachments in anterior teeth

0.021*

    0a

13 (17.6)

1 (2.0)

 

    1-2b

29 (39.2)

21 (41.2)

 

     > 2b

32 (43.2)

29 (56.9)

 

Attachments in incisors

0.222

    0

45 (60.8)

31 (60.8)

 

    1–2

25 (33.8)

13 (25.5)

 

     > 2

4 (5.4)

7 (13.7)

 

Attachments in central incisors

0.022*

    0a

66 (89.2)

40 (78.4)

 

    1a

7 (9.5)

4 (7.8)

 

    2b

1 (1.4)

7 (13.7)

 
  1. Data are given as mean ± SD or N (%)
  2. IPR interproximal enamel reduction
  3. P value < 0.05 was considered significant (*) given in Bold