Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of open gingival embrasures between the mild and moderate groups in the mandible

From: IPR treatment and attachments design in clear aligner therapy and risk of open gingival embrasures in adults

Variables

Mild (N = 37)

Moderate (N = 14)

P value

Age, years

26.1 ± 5.5

27.4 ± 6.0

0.477

Treatment duration, months

24.1 ± 9.3

28.9 ± 12.4

0.385

Sex

0.327

    Female

34 (91.9)

11 (78.6)

 

    Male

3 (8.1)

3 (21.4)

 

Malocclusion

0.812

    Class I

19 (51.3)

9 (64.3)

 

    Class II

14 (37.8)

4 (28.6)

 

    Class III

4 (10.8)

1 (7.1)

 

IPR in anterior teeth

0.527

    0 mm

12 (32.3)

6 (42.9)

 

    0–2 mm

13 (35.1)

6 (42.9)

 

    ≥ 2 mm

12 (32.4)

2 (14.3)

 

IPR in incisors

0.091

    0 mm

15 (40.5)

6 (42.9)

 

    0–1 mm

9 (24.3)

7 (50.0)

 

    ≥ 1 mm

13 (35.1)

1 (7.1)

 

IPR in central incisors

0.025*

    0 mm a

19 (51.4)

12 (85.7)

 

    > 0 mm b

18 (48.6)

2 (14.3)

 

Attachments in anterior teeth

0.820

    0

1 (2.7)

0 (0)

 

    1–2

16 (43.2)

5 (35.7)

 

     > 2

20 (54.1)

9 (64.3)

 

Attachments in incisors

0.607

    0

21 (56.8)

10 (71.4)

 

    1–2

11 (29.7)

2 (14.3)

 

     > 2

5 (13.5)

2 (14.3)

 

Attachments in central incisors

0.637

    0

28 (75.7)

12 (85.7)

 

    1

4 (10.8)

0 (0)

 

    2

5 (13.5)

2 (14.3)

 
  1. Data are given as mean ± SD or N (%)
  2. IPR interproximal enamel reduction
  3. P value < 0.05 was considered significant (*) given in Bold
  4. The difference of superscript letter (a & b) means significantly different between groups