Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between BR and GR groups

From: Prediction of Class II improvement after rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition

 

BR group

GR group

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

P

Age

8.32

1.10

8.29

1.06

0.945

SNA (°)

81.65

2.57

80.60

4.33

0.457

SNB (°)

76.79

2.01

75.01

4.62

0.223

ANB (°)

4.87

2.32

5.38

1.96

0.520

ANPg (°)

4.18

2.43

4.78

2.28

0.497

Wits (mm)

1.97

3.88

1.03

2.76

0.447

OVJ (mm)

6.82

3.53

5.04

1.94

0.091

AnsPns^GoGn (°)

22.83

3.31

24.29

4.67

0.356

SN^GoGn (°)

30.18

3.16

33.23

5.44

0.092

OVB (mm)

3.22

1.94

2.74

1.74

0.496

Ar^Go^N (°)

55.26

3.48

53.01

2.36

0.048*

N^Go^Me (°)

70.28

3.69

71.84

4.78

0.354

N^S^Ar (°)

125.38

3.95

124.94

4.97

0.804

S^Ar^Go (°)

140.85

4.22

144.66

4.81

0.036*

Sum. Jaraback (°)

391.77

3.58

394.46

6.79

0.222

Co-Gn (mm)

103.68

5.83

95.36

6.31

0.001**

S-Ar (mm)

32.59

3.75

28.93

3.18

0.008**

Ar-Go (mm)

41.17

3.99

37.49

2.75

0.006**

Go-Me (mm)

63.36

5.45

57.63

5.05

0.006**

  1. Data are shown as mean and SDs. Student’s t test was used to assess significance of the differences between groups, and significance levels are shown in P column
  2. BR bad responder, GR good responder
  3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01