Fig. 5From: A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional radiography in diagnosing the extent of root resorptionsModified Malmgren scores for CBCT, periapical radiographs (PA), and panoramic radiographs (PAN) versus gold standard (histology). PA and PAN differed significantly in both blinded (p < 0.05 and < 0.001 respectively) and not blinded (p < 0.05) compared to histologyBack to article page