Fig. 6From: A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional radiography in diagnosing the extent of root resorptionsComparison of linear measurements for CBCT, periapical radiographs (PA), and panoramic radiographs (PAN). PAN differed significantly in both blinded and not blinded (p < 0.001) compared to CBCT. Similarly, PAN differed significantly in both blinded (p < 0.01) and not blinded (p < 0.001) compared to PABack to article page