Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Quality assessment of the included case reports-series using the pilot assessment scale

From: Mandibular molar uprighting using orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review

A/A Cases Score Rating
1 Sohn 2008 14 lower medium quality
2 Park 2002 (case 1) 17 lower medium quality
3 Park 2002 (case 2) 12 lower medium quality
4 Park 2004 14 lower medium quality
5 Gracco 2007 19 lower medium quality
6 Lee 2007 (case 1) 15 lower medium quality
7 Lee 2007 (case 2) 19 lower medium quality
8 Lee 2007 (case 3) 15 lower medium quality
9 Celebi 2011 23 upper medium quality
10 Allgayer 2013 21 lower medium quality
11 Derton 2012 (Case 1) 15 lower medium quality
12 Derton 2012 (Case 2) 15 lower medium quality
13 Yun 2005 10 low quality
14 Lee 2009 25 upper medium quality
15 Nienkemper 2013 (Case 1) 12 lower medium quality
16 Nienkemper 2013 (Case 2) 13 lower medium quality
17 Giancotti 2004 8 low quality
18 Sivolella 2012 (Case 1) 14 lower medium quality
19 Sivolella 2012 (Case 2) 3 low quality
20 Sivolella 2012 (Case 3) 3 low quality
21 Sivolella 2012 (Case 4) 3 low quality
22 Sivolella 2012 (Case 5) 3 low quality
23 Musilli 2010 (case 1) 8 low quality
24 Musilli 2010 (case 2) 6 low quality
25 Musilli 2010 (case 3) 8 low quality
26 Greco 2012 14 lower medium quality
27 Padmaprabha 2015 28 upper medium quality
  1. Rating was done according to the following: low quality when the total score was 0–11, lower medium quality for scores 12–22, upper medium quality for scores 23–33 and high quality for scores 34–44