Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included randomized trials pertaining to follow-up and outcome

From: Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Study

Follow-up

Method/outcome

Bazargani [33]

Post-exp

Rhinomanometry

▪ Nasal airflow

▪ Nasal resistance

Plaster casts

▪ Dental arch width (IMW)

Canan [31]

• Post-exp

• 6.0 months post-exp

CBCT

▪ 3D tooth movements

▪ Dental arch width (ICW, IP1W, IMW)

▪ Dental tipping (P1, M)

Clinical

▪ Technical complications

Celenk-Koca [30]

• 6.0 months post-exp

CBCT

▪ Dental arch width (IP1W, IMW)

▪ Dental tipping (P1, M)

▪ Root resorption

▪ Skeletal maxillary width

▪ Skeletal sutural opening amount & pattern

Feldmann [37]

1st/4th exp day

Questionnaire

▪ Pain

▪ Discomfort

▪ Jaw function

▪ Analgesic consumption

Gunyuz Toklu [18]

3.0 mos post-exp

CBCT

▪ Facial width

▪ Skeletal maxillary width

▪ Buccal/palatal bone thickness (C, P1, P2, M)

▪ Alveolar (P1, M) / dental (C, P1, P2, M) tipping

▪ Dental arch width (ICW, IP1W, IP2W, IMW)

Lagravère 2009 [45]collated

• Post-exp

• 6.0 months post-exp

• 12.0 months post-exp

CBCT

▪ Nasal width

▪ Skeletal maxillary width

▪ Skeletal mandibular width

▪ Dental arch width (IP1W, IMW)

▪ Sagittal/vertical tooth movements (I, M)

▪ Sagittal/vertical skeletal mandibular position

Questionnaire

▪ Pain

Acoustic rhinometry

▪ Nasal airway volume

  1. CBCT cone beam computed tomography, Exp expansion, I incisor, IMW intermolar width, IP1W inter-(first)-premolar width, M molar, P1 first premolar, P2 second premolar
  2. Including the publications Lagravère 2010 [46], Lagravère 2013 [47], Kabalan 2015 [48], Stepanko 2016 [49] and the dissertations Lagravère 2009 [45], Forst 2015 [36]