Skip to main content

Table 5 Confounding variables for irregularity reduction, estimate, 95% confidence intervals, and estimate values for interactions

From: A comparative assessment of clinical efficiency between premium heat-activated copper nickel-titanium and superelastic nickel-titanium archwires during initial orthodontic alignment in adolescents: a randomized clinical trial

 

Model 1

Model 2

Estimate

95% CI

p value

Estimate

95% CI

p value

Intercept

7.28

 

0.002

9.56

 

< 0.001

Group (superelastic NiTi/heat-activated Cu-NiTi)

1.10

(− 1.31, 3.51)

0.370

-

-

-

Diameter

 (No archwire/0.014)

4.01

(2.51, 5.51)

< 0.001

3.60

(2.50, 4.70)

< 0.001

 (0.018/0.014)

0.24

(− 1.04, 1.51)

0.715

0.23

(− 0.64, 1.11)

0.597

Intercanine width

− 0.12

(− 0.25, − 0.00)

0.048

− 0.05

(− 0.06, 0.16)

0.367

Intermolar width

0.08

(− 0.43, 0.60)

0.055

-

-

-

Gender (female/male)

0.16

(− 0.35, 0.67)

0.537

-

-

-

Time

− 1.45

(− 2.05, − 0.85)

< 0.001

− 1.54

(− 1.96, − 1.13)

< 0.001

Group × diameter

 (Superelastic NiTi/heat-activated Cu-NiTi) × (no archwire/0.014)

− 0.82

(− 2.97, 1.33)

0.453

-

-

-

 (Superelastic NiTi/heat-activated Cu-NiTi) × (0.018/0.014)

− 0.02

(− 1.73, 1.69)

0.982

-

-

-

Group × time

 (Superelastic NiTi/heat-activated Cu-NiTi) × time

− 0.17

(− 1.01, 0.66)

0.686

-

-

-