From: Comparison of one versus two maxillary molars distalization with iPanda: a finite element analysis
Force | Tooth | Landmark | Displacement (μm) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x-axis | y-axis | z-axis | ||||||
One molar | Two molars | One molar | Two molars | One molar | Two molars | |||
50 g | First molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 0.10 | 1.92 | 0.03 | 0.39 | 0.19 | − 0.12 |
Palatal root | 0.01 | − 0.70 | 0.01 | − 0.20 | 0.01 | − 0.05 | ||
Distolingual cusp | − 0.01 | 2.18 | 0.04 | 0.81 | − 0.01 | − 0.84 | ||
Second molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 1.73 | 0.36 | 1.64 | 0.16 | − 0.47 | 0.09 | |
Mesiobuccal root | − 0.63 | − 0.04 | − 0.35 | 0.07 | − 0.09 | 0.07 | ||
Distolingual cusp | 1.72 | 0.30 | 1.78 | − 0.06 | − 0.55 | − 0.05 | ||
100 g | First molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 0.20 | 3.82 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 0.23 | − 0.24 |
Mesiobuccal root | 0.02 | − 1.39 | 0.02 | − 0.40 | 0.02 | − 0.10 | ||
Distolingual cusp | − 0.02 | 4.43 | 0.08 | 1.64 | − 0.02 | − 1.67 | ||
Second molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 3.62 | 0.72 | 2.59 | 0.32 | − 0.56 | 0.17 | |
Mesiobuccal root | − 1.34 | − 0.08 | − 0.47 | 0.13 | − 0.33 | 0.15 | ||
Distolingual cusp | 4.17 | 0.59 | 2.82 | − 0.11 | − 0.70 | − 0.11 | ||
200 g | First molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 0.40 | 7.60 | 0.12 | 1.68 | 0.28 | − 0.48 |
Mesiobuccal root | 0.04 | − 2.76 | 0.04 | − 0.80 | 0.04 | − 0.20 | ||
Distolingual cusp | − 0.04 | 9.00 | 0.16 | 3.32 | − 0.04 | − 3.32 | ||
Second molar | Mesiobuccal cusp | 7.57 | 1.44 | 4.09 | 0.64 | − 0.67 | 0.32 | |
Mesiobuccal root | − 2.85 | − 0.16 | − 0.63 | 0.24 | − 1.21 | 0.32 | ||
Distolingual cusp | 10.11 | 1.16 | 4.47 | − 0.20 | − 0.89 | − 0.24 |