Skip to main content

Table 2 Between-group comparisons in the mean differences between programmed and implemented IPR

From: Evaluation of interproximal reduction in individual teeth, and full arch assessment in clear aligner therapy: digital planning versus 3D model analysis after reduction

Group

Region

n patients

n teeth

Programmed IPR (P-IPR)

Implemented IPR (I-IPR)

(P-IPR) − (I-IPR)

95% CI for mean IPR difference

p. Value for difference between P-IPR and I-IPR

p Value for between group comparison of difference between P-IPR and I-IPR

All (anterior and posterior)

Lower arch

53

362

0.31 ± 0.17

0.17 ± 0.16

0.14 ± 0.19

[0.12; 0.16]

 < .0001****

0.4783

Upper arch

43

204

0.28 ± 0.16

0.15 ± 0.15

0.13 ± 0.17

[0.105; 0.153]

 < .0001****

All (anterior and posterior)

Left side

74

286

0.29 ± 0.16

0.15 ± 0.15

0.13 ± 0.18

[0.112; 0.154]

 < .0001****

0.6789

Right side

71

280

0.30 ± 0.17

0.17 ± 0.16

0.14 ± 0.19

[0.117; 0.161]

 < .0001****

Anterior teeth (1,2,3)

Lower

53

274

0.33 ± 0.16

0.17 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.20

[0.133; 0.18]

 < .0001****

0.0302*

Upper

42

149

0.26 ± 0.15

0.14 ± 0.15

0.12 ± 0.17

[0.087; 0.144]

 < .0001****

Anterior teeth (1,2,3)

Left

73

213

0.30 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.16

0.14 ± 0.19

[0.114; 0.165]

 < .0001****

0.7708

Right

70

210

0.30 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.16

0.14 ± 0.19

[0.119; 0.171]

 < .0001****

Posterior teeth (4,5)

Lower

38

88

0.24 ± 0.15

0.15 ± 0.15

0.09 ± 0.15

[0.058; 0.122]

 < .0001****

0.0059**

Upper

22

55

0.32 ± 0.18

0.16 ± 0.14

0.17 ± 0.16

[0.122; 0.208]

 < .0001****

Posterior teeth (4,5)

Left

48

73

0.25 ± 0.15

0.13 ± 0.14

0.11 ± 0.15

[0.08; 0.15]

 < .0001****

0.7413

Right

44

70

0.29 ± 0.17

0.17 ± 0.15

0.12 ± 0.17

[0.084; 0.163]

 < .0001****

  1. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001, ****P< .0001