Skip to main content

Table 2 Means, standard deviations, and Tukey’s analysis of the surface microhardness and surface roughness of the studied groups (p < 0.0001)

From: Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate and universal adhesive resin as a complementary approach for management of white spot lesions: an in-vitro study

Group

Surface microhardness (kg/mm2)

Surface roughness (μm)

I (Sound enamel)

319.2a ± 3.16

1c ± 0.02

II (Artificially created WSLs)

177.8e ± 2.2

2.35a ± 0.21

III (ICON resin-treated WSLs)

248.3c ± 3.03

1.65b ± 0.16

IV (CPP-ACP-treated WSLs)

274.48b ± 3.54

1.83b ± 0.08

V (Universal adhesive resin-treated WSLs)

196.78d ± 5.35

1.73b ± 0.07

VI (CPP-ACP and universal adhesive resin-treated WSLs)

286.82b ± 4.57

1.56b ± 0.1

  1. Means with the same superscript letter in each column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05