Progress in Orthodontics

Table 5 Binary logistic regression models showing the relationship between the dependent factors and adenoid hypertrophy, for each of the three assessment methods

From: Prevalence of adenoid hypertrophy among 12-year-old children and its association with craniofacial characteristics: a cross-sectional study

		At/Nd			Ad-Ba/PNS-Ba			1-Npaa/Npa
		AOR	p value	Pseudo R²	AOR	p value	Pseudo R²	AOR	p value	Pseudo R²
Covariates adjustments
				0.148			0.103			0.121
Sex	Male	1.000	0.303		1.000	0.445		1.000	0.071
Sex	Female	1.397			1.263			1.871
Growth stage	Pre-pubertal	1.000	0.921		1.000	0.727		1.000	0.788
	Pubertal	1.002			0.906			1.074
	Postpubertal	1.108			1.139			1.247
Craniofacial factors
SNB		0.818	0.003		0.880	0.044		0.773	< 0.001
ANB		1.475	< 0.001		1.404	< 0.001		1.388	< 0.001
Wits		0.853	0.003		0.865	0.005		0.847	0.005
Cd-Gn		1.075	0.014		1.052	0.064		1.083	0.011
MnP^SN		0.943	0.532		0.897	0.226		0.869	0.171
MxP^MnP		1.025	0.729		1.083	0.249		1.124	0.142
TPFH/TAFH		7.119	0.779		0.372	0.882		12.907	0.737
OPT^SN		0.947	0.312		0.927	0.141		0.917	0.137
C2ps-C4pi^SN		1.064	0.259		1.093	0.089		1.083	0.179
H-CV		1.073	0.042		1.058	0.094		1.064	0.093
H-FH		0.980	0.349		0.972	0.183		0.965	0.139

AOR adjusted odd ratio, R² coefficient of determination
Significant p values are reported in bold
SNA was removed from the model because of redundancy with SNB and ANB (and it showed no statistical significance in the group comparison)

Back to article page