Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of comparing VAS scores for MAP images

From: The relationship between different levels of facial attractiveness and malocclusion perception: an eye tracking and survey study

 

Photographs

p value

P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

P7

Orthodontist

4.48 ± 1.43A

5.98 ± 1.72A

5.00 ± 1.44A

4.08 ± 1.76A

3.02 ± 1.42A

3.14 ± 1.67A

3.24 ± 1.64A

3.00 ± 1.55A

 < .001β

Dentist

4.64 ± 1.52A

6.30 ± 1.75A

5.68 ± 2.08A

4.12 ± 1.78A

3.12 ± 1.52A

3.00 ± 1.46A

3.18 ± 1.38A

3.46 ± 1.42A

 < .001β

Orthodontic Patient

4.78 ± 1.85A

6.60 ± 2.37A

6.00 ± 2.58A

5.16 ± 2.33AB

4.14 ± 2.37A

2.68 ± 1.78A

3.32 ± 1.88A

3.22 ± 1.82A

 < .001β

Lay persons

4.68 ± 1.95A

6.80 ± 2.22A

6.08 ± 2.41A

5.70 ± 2.48B

4.30 ± 2.53A

3.06 ± 1.98A

3.40 ± 2.00A

3.34 ± 1.87A

 < .001β

p value

.892α

.069α

.037α

.001α

.018α

.366α

.977α

.451α

 

Total average

4.64 ± 1.69

6.42 ± 2.04

5.69 ± 2.19

4.76 ± 2.21

3.64 ± 2.08

2.97 ± 1.72

3.28 ± 1.72

3.25 ± 1.67

 
  1. In intergroup comparisons, different letters in the same column indicate statistically significant difference
  2. Intragroup comparisons: For Orthodontists: 0 < 1, 0 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 1 > 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 2 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 3 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7. Dentists: 0 < 1, 2, 0 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 1 > 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 2 > 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 3 > 4, 5 ve 6. Orthodontic patients: 0 < 1, 2; 0 > 5, 6 ve 7; 1 > 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 2 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 3 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 4 > 5; 5 < 6. Lay persons: 0 < 1, 2; 0 > 5,6, 7; 1 > 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 2 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 3 > 4, 5, 6 ve 7; 4 > 5,6 ve 7
  3. P0, Resting; P1, Ideal smile; P2, − 2 mm low smile line; P3, + 4 mm gingival smile; P4, + 6 mm gingival smile; P5, Maxillary anterior crowding; P6, Median diastema; P7, Polydiastema
  4. αKruskal–Wallis test, p value < 0.05
  5. βFriedman test, p value < 0.017