Skip to main content

Table 2 Trial characteristics (N = 196)

From: Clinical evaluation of marketed and non-marketed orthodontic products: are researchers now ahead of the times? A meta-epidemiological study

Trial characteristic

N (%)

Year of publication

 

2017

37 (18.8)

2018

35 (17.9)

2019

36 (18.4)

2020

41 (20.9)

2021

40 (20.4)

2022

7 (3.6)

Number of authors

 

1–3

43 (21.9)

4–6

105 (53.6)

> 7

48 (25.5)

Continent of corresponding author

 

Europe

79 (40.3)

Americas

44 (22.5)

Asia and other

73 (37.2)

Type of product

 

Marketed

128 (65.3)

Non-marketed

68 (34.7)

Intervention type

 

Orthodontic bracket

13 (6.6)

Orthodontic archwire

9 (4.6)

Removable appliance

28 (14.3)

Non-surgical adjunctive

21 (10.7)

Surgical adjunctive

7 (3.6)

Oral health

11 (5.6)

Orthodontic auxiliaries

13 (6.6)

Materials

29 (14.8)

Growth modification

35 (17.9)

Medication (e.g. topical LA)

5 (2.5)

Retention

18 (9.2)

Technology (e.g. mobile app, social media)

6 (3.1)

Radiographs

1 (0.5)

Justification of intervention

 

Accelerate treatment

18 (9.2)

Aesthetics

2 (1.0)

Reduce iatrogenic effects

48 (24.5)

Retain tooth position

18 (9.2)

Reduce pain

17 (8.7)

Improve knowledge Oral health

9 (4.6)

Dental development

7 (3.6)

Treatment efficiency

66 (33.7)

Compliance

9 (4.5)

Systemic effects

2 (1.0)

Direction of intervention effect

 

Positive effect compared to control

88 (44.9)

Negative effect compared to control

15 (7.7)

No difference detected between interventions or between intervention and untreated control

93 (47.4)

Declaration of conflict of interest

 

Conflicts exist and declared

9 (4.6)

No conflicts to declare

130 (66.3)

Not clearly declared

57 (29.1)

Declaration of industry funding

 

Industry funded and declared

34 (17.4)

No industry sponsorship to declare

103 (52.5)

Not clearly declared

59 (30.1)

Total

196 (100.0)