Skip to main content

Table 1 Eligibility criteria for the present systematic review

From: Assessment of the efficacy of various maxillary molar intrusion therapies: a systematic review

Domain

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Participants

Orthodontic patients requiring maxillary molar intrusion for either open bite correction or pre-prosthetic applications, without age or gender predilection

Participants with systemic diseases or disabilities

Subjects treated with orthognathic surgery or surgical adjunctive procedures

Subjects in primary dentition stage

Interventions

Intrusion of maxillary molars with conventional treatment modalities (posterior bite blocks, headgear, magnets, vertical chin cup, spring loaded bite blocks, removable or fixed appliances) and/or with the use of TADs

Surgically assisted treatment protocols for posterior segment intrusion

Comparison

Intrusion of maxillary molars with conventional or TAD based mechanisms, or control group

 

Outcomes

Primary outcomes

Amount of maxillary molar intrusion

Rate of maxillary molar intrusion

Secondary outcomes

Amount of root resorption associated with intrusion

Vertical movement of mandibular molars

Stability of intrusion

Patient reported outcomes

Compliance

Cost effectiveness

Adverse effects

No restrictions on data collection sources (dental models, clinical measurements and radiographs were considered)

 

Study design

Randomized controlled trials

Animal studies, prospective non-randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, systematic reviews, case reports and case series

  1. TAD: temporary anchorage device