Skip to main content

Aging changes in maxillary anterior teeth in untreated individuals: an observational longitudinal study

Abstract

Objective

The aging of the occlusion and tooth wears influence the smile design This study aimed at evaluating the aging changes of maxillary anterior teeth in nontreated subjects.

Methods

The sample comprised dental models of 23 subjects (13 male, 10 female) with normal occlusions, taken at 13 (T1), 17 (T2) and 61 (T3) years of age. The following variables were measured in the maxillary anterior teeth using digital dental models: crown width/height proportion, anterior view width, crown angulation, gingival and incisal steps between central/lateral incisors and central incisors/canines. Interphase comparisons were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Tukey tests or Friedman tests. Sexual differences were evaluated using t tests (P < 0.05).

Results

From 13 to 61 years of age, a decrease of crown width/height proportion (P = 0.008 and P =  < 0.001, for the lateral incisor and canines, respectively) and mesiodistal angulation (P =  < 0.001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.025 for the central incisor, lateral incisor and canines, respectively) of the maxillary anterior teeth were observed. The steps of the gingival margin and the incisal steps decreased with aging.

Conclusions

From adolescence to late adulthood, untreated individuals with normal occlusions demonstrated changes in the maxillary anterior teeth that may impair the smile esthetics and attractiveness.

Introduction

The seeking for orthodontic treatment by adult patients has been largely increased in the last decades [1]. An increased awareness of the need for adequate oral health and a greater expectation for dental esthetics from the society has occurred [1,2,3]. Approximately 49% of adults seeking orthodontic treatment have a chief complaint related to dental and facial esthetics [1]. Maturational changes specifically at the maxillary anterior teeth should be better understand for an adequate diagnosis and treatment plan for adult patients.

In general, clinical crown size changes with aging [4]. Subjects from 11 to 19 years of age showed an increase in the clinical crown length of anterior teeth [5]. A remarkable increase of crown height was observed from 13 to 60 years of age [6]. From adolescence to mature adulthood, the crown height increased 0.22, 0.76 and 1.50 mm for maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors and canines, respectively [6]. Mesiodistal crown width decreased as a result of interproximal attrition with aging [6, 7]. A 10-year follow-up study in Swedish women with initial age of 48 years showed a common tendency of crown lengthening due to significant extrusion of + 0.3 mm on average of the anterior maxillary teeth [8]. Gingival changes explain the clinical crown height increase with aging. From 6 to 16 years of age, gingival margin shows a continuous migration toward apical [9]. Adolescent patients at 15 years of age presented an apical migration of the gingival margin of 0.44 mm in 10 years of follow-up [10].

Despite the increase in crown height with aging, incisal tooth wear also occurs in adult patients [11]. During the aging process, erosive tooth wear caused by acid diet, attrition and abrasion occurs [12]. Occlusal/incisal surfaces displayed high wear scores in mature adults, especially in men [13]. The amount of tooth wear also influences the smile esthetics as the greater the tooth wear, the more unattractive is the smile [14]. A decrease in the maxillary incisors exposure for the upper lip is also expected with aging impairing smile esthetics [15]. A previous study showed that the maxillary incisor display for the upper lip decreased 3.6 mm from 17 to 61 years of age [16].

However, currently few evidence on the long-term gingival changes of the maxillary anterior teeth until the seventh decade of life is available. Positional changes on the maxillary anterior teeth are expected with the aging process. Understanding the aging changes of the anterior teeth is important to an adequate diagnosis and treatment planning of mature adult patients. In addition, maturational changes of the anterior teeth can have an influence on the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the positional and gingival changes of the maxillary anterior teeth expected from adolescence to late adulthood on digital dental models of untreated subjects.

Material and methods

Study design

This was an observational and longitudinal study. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee in Human Research at Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo (process number #22082119.3.0000.5417).

Participants and setting

The sample comprised 23 White-Brazilian nontreated subjects (10 female, 13 male) with normal occlusion from the files of the Orthodontic Department at age 13 years (T1), 17 years (T2) and 61 years (T3), as shown in Fig. 1. The mean follow-up period was 47.98 years (SD, 0.95; range, 46.44–50.37). At T1, 82 individuals were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: normal occlusion [6, 16, 17] in the complete permanent teeth, dental Class I relationship, absence of crossbites, normal overjet and overbite, maximum of 2 mm of incisor crowding and no previous orthodontic treatment. The sample at T1 and T2 had been collected as a reference for facial growth studies in the Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. Patients were recalled at T3 for studying the aging of the normal occlusion. The exclusion criteria at T3 were history of orthodontic treatment and multiple or complete tooth losses. At T3, 23 patients out of 80 were found or agreed to participate.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maxillary digital dental models of a female subject from the sample at T1 (13 years), T2 (17 years) and T3 (61 years)

Variables and measurements

Dental models at the three-time points were digitized using an R700 3-dimensional (3D) scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Dental model measurements were performed using OrthoAnalyzer three-dimensional software (3Shape) by a single examiner (G.N.). The investigator was initially trained for performing the analysis.

The occlusal plane was used as reference for standardize the maxillary dental model position (Fig. 2). The following linear and angular measurements were performed in maxillary anterior teeth: (1) crown width/height proportion, (2) mesiodistal dimension in the frontal perspective (anterior view width), (3) crown mesiodistal angulation, gingival steps (4) and incisal steps (5) between the central and lateral incisors (CI/LI) and between the central incisors and canines (CI/C) (Fig. 3). The crown height was measured from the gingival zenith to the incisal edge [5]. The crown width dimension considered the maximum distance between the mesial and distal contact points of each tooth (Fig. 3A). The width/height proportion was calculated after each value was recorded.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The occlusal plane was defined as a plane passing bilaterally through the tip of the first molar mesiobuccal cusp and through the mesioincisal point of the right central incisor

Fig. 3
figure 3

Measurements performed in the maxillary digital dental models: A Crown width/height proportion. The crown height measured from the gingival zenith to the incisal edge and crown width considered the maximum distance between the mesial and distal contact points; The width/height proportion was calculated after each value was recorded; B Mesiodistal dimension in the frontal view, with the occlusal plane parallel to the ground; C Crown angulation, measured using the occlusal plane and the long axis of the clinical crown; For D gingival and E incisal level between CI/LI and CI/C, a reference line was drawn parallelly to the occlusal plane and tangent to the most cervical portion of the gingival margin of the right central incisor was positioned. D Gingival level considered the distance between the reference line and the most cervical position of the gingival margin; E Incisal level was calculated using the distance between the reference line to the incisal edge of each tooth. Negative values indicated an apical position

The occlusal plane was positioned parallel to the ground for measuring the anterior view width, crown mesiodistal angulation, gingival and incisal steps (2–5). The mesiodistal dimension was measured in the frontal view (Fig. 3B). Crown mesiodistal angulation was evaluated using the occlusal plane and the long axis of the clinical crown. The actual angulation value was the obtained value minus 90º. (Fig. 3C). A reference line was drawn parallelly to the occlusal plane and tangent to the most cervical portion of the gingival margin of the right central incisor was positioned to evaluate the gingival and incisal steps. The gingival step considered the distance between the reference line and the most cervical region of the gingival margin of each tooth, allowing the calculation of CI/LI and CI/C gingival steps for each side (Fig. 3D). The distance between the reference line to the incisal edge of each tooth was measured to calculate the CI/LI and CI/C incisal step of each side (Fig. 3E). Negative values indicated an apical position.

Study error

After one month from the first measurement, 30% of the sample were randomly selected and remeasured by the same examiner (G.N.). The intra-examiner reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) [18] and the Bland–Altman method [19].

Statistical analyses

Normal distribution of data was evaluated using Shapiro–Wilk test. The average right and left sides were used for statistics. Interphase comparisons were evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey tests or Friedman tests and Durbin-Conover tests. Comparisons between males and females were performed using t tests. All tests were performed with the Jamovi software (version 1.2.22), at P < 0.05. Data were analyzed blindly. A post hoc power analysis was also evaluated using the bilateral parametric test from the GPower software (Version 3.1.9.7, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany).

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficients varied from 0.86 to 0.98, indicating excellent intrarater agreement. The variable with the widest limit of agreement was the canine angulation ( − 3.61 and 4.66). The power of the sample was 99%, considering a mean change of 1.47 mm (SD = 1.38) in the canine crown height variable and a 5% significance level.

The aging process influenced most of the variables from T1 to T3 (Table 1). Crown width, mesiodistal angulation and gingival and incisal step decreased over time. On the other hand, clinical crown height increased. The anterior view width remained stable with no significant changes.

Table 1 Interphase comparison of anterior teeth measurements (ANOVA and Friedman tests)

From 13 to 17 years of age, lateral incisors and canines showed significant width/height proportion decrease (Table 1). Mesiodistal angulation decreased for all teeth. CI/C gingival step showed a significant decrease from T1 to T2.

From 17 to 61 years of age, crown mesiodistal angulation of central and lateral incisors continued to decrease (Table 1). Reductions in the CI/LI gingival and incisal step and in the CI/C gingival step were observed.

No sexual difference was observed, except for the canine angulation, which decreased more in women from T1 to T2 (Table 2).

Table 2 Male and female changes comparisons (t-tests)

Discussion

The maxillary anterior teeth are key factors for smile esthetics. For the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating aging changes at the maxillary anterior region in nontreated subjects with normal occlusion. The changes promoted by aging in the smile esthetics were slight. However, when assessing anterior teeth esthetics, mild changes can cause a significant visual impact. Excellent intrarater agreement was found for all measurements. The examiner was trained for the measurements and only started the analysis when achieved a high precision. Long-term follow-ups of the occlusion in adults are challenging due to the difficulties in locating the subjects for follow-up appointments [6, 16, 17]. The follow-up time was approximately 50 decades in this study. The difficulties at T3 recruitment were changes in address, phone number and name due marriage. In addition, occlusal and dental status may change over time including tooth losses, prosthesis and dental restorations. In our study, the subjects who presented any of aforementioned changes in the maxillary anterior region were excluded. Previous studies analyzing this same sample of untreated patients demonstrated the maturational occlusal and cephalometric changes [6, 16, 17]. The main changes observed after 47 years of follow-up were mandibular crowding, decrease in the overbite, changes in the maxillary second molar position, increase in the clinical crown length, discoloration, increases in the maxillary and mandibular anterior displacement, and increases in the facial and ramus height [6, 16, 17].

From adolescence to late adulthood, the width/height proportion decreased in lateral incisors and canines from T1 to T2. The explanation is that clinical crown height increase and the mesiodistal crown width decrease during aging [6]. This result is in agreement with previous studies that reported interproximal wear and reductions of mesiodistal tooth size [6, 20, 21]. We speculate that no change in width/height proportion occurred in the central incisors due to a greater amount of incisal wear that compensates the changes in the gingival level. The anterior view width showed slight but no significant decrease from T1 to T3. This slight reduction can be explained by the expected mesiodistal tooth size decrease that occurs with the aging process [6].

Crown mesiodistal angulation significantly decreased for all anterior teeth with aging. Central incisors showed a progressive angulation decrease from adolescence until the seventh decade of life. On the other hand, the lateral incisors and canines showed a decrease of the mesiodistal angulation only from 13 to 17 years of age. A previous study using digital dental models of subjects with a mean age of 70 years found a mesiodistal angulation of 1.26º for maxillary central incisors, 5.46º for lateral incisors and 7.84º for canines [22]. The uprighting of maxillary anterior teeth during aging might collaborate with the absence of late incisor crowding in the maxillary arch observed in nontreated individuals [6].

The gingival step between central and lateral incisors decreased by 0.4 mm from T1 to T3. The gingival step between the central incisors and canines also decreased by 1.2 mm during the observational time. At T3, the gingival margin of the central incisor and canines were almost at the same level. These changes are probably related to an apical displacement of the gingival margin of these teeth [10]. The apical migration of the gingival margin of lateral incisors and canines should have been greater compared to the central incisors explaining the decrease in the gingival steps. A previous study performed in subjects from 22 to 84 years of age showed that gingival recessions in the maxilla were more common at canines and lateral incisors [23]. Thinner buccal bone thickness and less distance between cementoenamel junction and bone crest are expected for anterior teeth with gingival recessions [23]. If gingival recessions are more frequent in maxillary canines and lateral incisors compared to central incisors, the natural apical migration of the gingival margin during aging is also expected to be greater in these regions.

The incisal step between central and lateral incisors observed during adolescence was lost until late adulthood (Fig. 4). These findings were expected due to incisal tooth wear that occurs during aging [11, 24]. Anterior teeth show a significant level of tooth wear caused by the anterior guidance [25]. Throughout life, teeth are exposed to physical injuries as parafunctional habits and regular mastication and chemical exposure including acidic drinks/foods and gastric reflux, which contributes to tooth wear [26, 27]. The overbite reduction and the edge-to-edge incisor relationship are common features observed during aging, especially in men [6, 17]. Consequently, the incisal edge of the maxillary incisors becomes at the same level and may cause a smile impairment. Previous studies on the influence of vertical position of central incisors on the smile esthetics showed that no step between the maxillary incisors was considered unattractive [28, 29]. The incisal edge of the maxillary anterior teeth affected by tooth wear can be augmented in the adulthood aiming a smile esthetic improvement [30]. In addition, the incisal tooth wear and loss of the incisal step between central and lateral incisors might have an influence on the anterior functional guidance increasing the surface of contact between maxillary and mandibular incisors. However, the anterior functional guidance was not assessed in any of the timepoints of this study.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Male subject at 13 (T1), 17 (T2) and 61 years of age (T3). Observe the reductions of the incisal step between the central and lateral incisors

From adolescence to early adulthood, the maxillary canines demonstrated a greater mesiodistal upright movement in females than males (Table 2). These differences might be explained by the late facial growth pattern. In women, the mandible rotates down and backward during aging while in men the mandible displaced forward and downward [16, 31]. The greater upright movement of maxillary canine upright in women might represent a sagittal compensation for a more convex profile. Small dental adjustments may occur to maintain an adequate occlusion in front of skeletal changes during the aging process.

Limitations

The limitation of this study is the lack of information on diet and parafunctional habits, factors that could have influenced anterior teeth wear. Another limitation of this study is the small sample size. The number of patients included in the study can be justified by the longitudinal design of this study, which offers considerable challenges in data collection. However, this study provided important information about aging covering maturation over 48 years, following a same sample longitudinally. Future studies should compare the aging changes in maxillary anterior teeth of untreated subjects and orthodontically treated patients.

Conclusions

From 13 to 61 years of age, the following changes occurred in the maxillary anterior teeth:

  • The crown width/height proportion and mesiodistal teeth angulation decreased;

  • The gingival step between central and lateral incisors and between central incisors and canines decreased;

  • The incisal step between the central and lateral incisors decreased.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI/LI:

Central and lateral incisors

CI/C:

Central incisors and canines

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. de Souza RA, de Oliveira AF, Pinheiro SM, Cardoso JP, Magnani MB. Expectations of orthodontic treatment in adults: the conduct in orthodontist/patient relationship. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013;18:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliveira PG, Tavares RR, Freitas JC. Assessment of motivation, expectations and satisfaction of adult patients submitted to orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013;18:81–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gosney MB. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1986;13:87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaidonis JA. Tooth wear: the view of the anthropologist. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S21-26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrow LA, Robbins JW, Jones DL, Wilson NH. Clinical crown length changes from age 12–19 years: a longitudinal study. J Dent. 2000;28:469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Massaro C, Miranda F, Janson G, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Pinzan A, Martins DR, et al. Maturational changes of the normal occlusion: a 40-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154:188–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paulino V, Paredes V, Cibrian R, Gandia JL. Tooth size changes with age in a Spanish population: percentile tables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e840-844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huanca Ghislanzoni L, Jonasson G, Kiliaridis S. Continuous eruption of maxillary teeth and changes in clinical crown length: A 10-year longitudinal study in adult women. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:1082–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P. The position of the gingival margin as expressed by clinical crown height in children aged 6–16 years. J Dent. 1976;4:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Theytaz GA, Christou P, Kiliaridis S. Gingival changes and secondary tooth eruption in adolescents and adults: a longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:S129-132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu B, Zhang M, Chen Y, Yao Y. Tooth wear in aging people: an investigation of the prevalence and the influential factors of incisal/occlusal tooth wear in northwest China. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartlett D, O'Toole S. Tooth Wear: Best evidence consensus statement. J Prosthodont 2020.

  13. Donachie MA, Walls AW. Assessment of tooth wear in an ageing population. J Dent. 1995;23:157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Machado AW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Correia LN, Reis SA, Conti AC, Capelozza Filho L, Almeida-Pedrin RR. Age-related changes in the Brazilian woman’s smile. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30: e35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garib D, Natsumeda GM, Massaro C, Miranda F, Naveda R, Janson G. Cephalometric changes during aging in subjects with normal occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021;29: e20210199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Miranda F, Massaro C, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Henriques JFC, Lauris JRP, et al. Aging of the normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. d’Incau E, Couture C, Maureille B. Human tooth wear in the past and the present: tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:214–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Begg PR. Stone age man’s dentition: with reference to anatomically correct occlusion, the etiology of malocclusion, and a technique for its treatment. Am J Orthod. 1954;40:298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuma A, Motegi E, Fukagawa H, Nomura M, Kano M, Sueishi K, et al. Mesio-distal tooth angulation in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. D’Silva E, Fraser D, Wang B, Barmak AB, Caton J, Tsigarida A. The association between gingival recession and buccal bone at maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2020;91:484–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schierz O, Dommel S, Hirsch C, Reissmann DR. Occlusal tooth wear in the general population of Germany: effects of age, sex, and location of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Panek H, Matthews-Brzozowska T, Nowakowska D, Panek B, Bielicki G, Makacewicz S, et al. Dynamic occlusions in natural permanent dentition. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:337–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganss C. Definition of erosion and links to tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, Ganss C. Dental erosion–an overview with emphasis on chemical and histopathological aspects. Caries Res. 2011;45(Suppl 1):2–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Menezes EBC, Bittencourt MAV, Machado AW. Do different vertical positions of maxillary central incisors influence smile esthetics perception? Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22:95–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Machado AW, McComb RW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25:392–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Radnai M, Kocsis SG. Minimally invasive method for the restoration of localized anterior tooth wear. A case report. Fogorv Sz. 2013;106:11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Behrents RG. Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton Ann Arbor: Center of Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1985.

Download references

Funding

This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil [CAPES]—Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GN (first author) contributed to conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, and writing original draft. FM contributed to original draft review and editing, investigation and resources. CM contributed to original draft review and editing, investigation and resources. JRPL contributed to investigation, resources, original draft review and editing. DG contributed to conceptualization, formal analysis, resources, original draft preparation and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felicia Miranda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Brazil (Protocol Number: 22082119.3.0000.5417).

Consent for publication

The content of the manuscript has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Consent was obtained from the patient and parents.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natsumeda, G., Miranda, F., Massaro, C. et al. Aging changes in maxillary anterior teeth in untreated individuals: an observational longitudinal study. Prog Orthod. 24, 26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00478-z

Keywords